logo

Info


Reviewbucket.co.uk scanned the internet for Olympus 10x50 DPS I reviews.
You can find all Olympus 10x50 DPS I reviews and ratings on this page.

Read the reviews.

Analysis


For Olympus 10x50 DPS I, 1363 customer reviews collected from 3 e-commerce sites, and the average score is 4.7.

Detailed seller stats;
Amazon has 1337 customer reviews and the average score is 4.7. Go to this seller.
Argos has 24 customer reviews and the average score is 4.9. Go to this seller.
Waveinn has 2 customer reviews and the average score is 4.5. Go to this seller.

Similar Items

13.11.2013

I should start by saying that I have been watching aircraft for over 50 years now and don't intend to stop. I have had a series of binoculars and telescopes of various types and all have had their advantages and disadvantages in certain situations. Some, I simply couldn't get on with, and they ended up passed on to a charity shop. There are so many variables with optical equipment, what you intend to use it for, and your personal requirements and abilities, that it is impossible to give anything but a subjective review here. When on a trip or at an airport I prefer a small pair of unobtrusive Pentax 10x mini-bins as I will inevitably have my digital camera and its powerful and heavy zoom lens with me - that does the job nicely.When at home trying to identify an aircraft seen in the sky from the garden or through a window a good 20-60x zoom spotting scope also does nicely, all you need is a leaning post to hold the front end against to keep steady - but just try scanning the sky for something you can't see with the naked eye using a powerful telescope and you'll see the problem - it's hard enough finding the things you <can> see. Not all distant aircraft leave thick white trails behind them or sparkle in the sun or are silhouettes against white cloud: there are a surprising amount up there that you (or maybe it's just "I") can't see without a bit of help. Sometimes you can hear them, sometimes you know roughly where they are supposed to be in these days of "virtual radar" (eg [...] You have to scan the sky to find them and you can't do that with the tiny field of view you get from a 20-60 telescope or a pair of mini-bins. For the last 30 years I have been using a cheap pair of 7-15x35 "own brand" zoom binoculars from the UK high-street emporium formerly known as Dixons. From 7x magnification up to about 10 they are clear, anything higher is pretty useless. They have survived well, but I felt the urge for something better and plumped for these 10x50s with a respected brand name. The old ones will be retired to an upstairs window facing the approach to the local airport, for when I forget to take the new ones up with me.The binoculars look and feel quite nice. No silly blue and orange paint like the old ones. They look even better when you peel the unnecessary labels off and I was pleased to find that this does not leave a sticky residue. Unlike the previous ones there is no stippled surface to collect dirt and sweat, they are smooth and should be easy to clean. I shall not be fitting the neck strap. I never do, they just get in the way, get caught on door-handles etc. If I'm out and about the camera is round my neck anyway. Likewise the case and lens caps, it takes far too long to get them off, and then hunt for them afterwards (my short-term memory no longer exists). All you have to do is keep the binoculars where they won't get dusty, I have a handy foam-lined drawer by my desk, just grab and run. Size and weight are irrelevant to me, as I won't be lugging these binoculars around for more than a few minutes at a time.They are nicely balanced and my hands fall in just the right place to hold them steady with a good sure grip. Yes, they are heavier, and bigger, than the ones they replace, but the weight helps the balance. They certainly give a very clear view, colours are startlingly bright. I have not noticed any aberrations or fringing yet. Lack of clarity around the edges of the circle of view is something that can be measured precisely in camera lenses but in binoculars I think that for each individual user it varies with eyesight, how you hold the binoculars to your face, glasses if worn, the use of the eyecups, the diopter adjustment and the precise setting of the distance between the eyepieces. The latter in particular affects whether or not you see a single image or two, and I would have appreciated a few mm more adjustment as my eyes are just that little bit too close together. I find that if I park the top of the eyepieces against my brow-ridges the double-image resolves slowly into one, presumably my lazier eye is drawn inwards. This is a problem I have with all binoculars except my mini-bins which adjust to my eye-spacing perfectly, and it gets worse the more powerful they are. I have got quite used to closing my left eye. It probably doesn't help that I wear glasses with varifocal lenses, but if I take my glasses off (a) I'll fall over something (my neighbour's cat invariably comes in the back door when I go out of it, and often vice versa) and (b) - same problem as the lens caps in previous paragraph ! After some weeks' use I am a little surprised to be able to report that I no longer see a double-image and can keep both eyes open without problem. I do believe that most of the problems people report are due to their eyesight and the way they use the equipment - ideally you should try before you buy, and not just a 5 minute trial looking around the interior of the shop. But of course it's harder to get a bargain that way.One plus point is that the focussing and eyepiece adjustments are quite stiff at the moment - unlike others who comment on this, I really hope they stay that way. What I look for is mainly miles and miles away and at the same focus point. You can scan a blue sky and not find what you're looking for at all if the binoculars aren't focussed properly - and you can't focus properly until you've found the target to focus on. If the binoculars stay focussed at roughly the right point between uses you stand a much better chance of avoiding this Catch-22. I am delighted to say that since initially focussing on a trail about 20 miles away and setting the right eyepiece diopter correction, I haven't had to adjust anything since. A shaky image is something people also complain about, but it's the people who shake. Can't blame the binoculars for that and unless you have a medical problem you just have to learn how to control it, like using a slow shutter speed on a camera - a matter of support, technique and practice.Now the really important bit, in case you've skipped the rest. Can you see anything through them ? The answer is a resounding "YES!". As mentioned the image is clear and bright with bright colours, better than anything I have tried before. I have used them at night, and have never seen such sparkly and colourful stars before. Sometimes it's hard to tell stars from flashing aircraft strobe lights. The image is realistic enough to be immersive, and several times I have automatically ducked when it seemed a seagull was about to fly into my face.After all these years I am finally happy with a pair of binoculars that suit me. About the only improvements I could suggest would be something to make them see through clouds and an attachable umbrella :) Oh, and a better fit for those with close-set eyes. Had I paid twice as much for these binoculars I would have been happy - at £50 I'm almost over the moon (and that looks pretty good through them too). I have barely touched the telescope since they arrived, the image through the binoculars, although smaller, is clearer than the more magnified image through the telescope. Unless the sky itself is perfectly clear, no amount of magnification will improve matters.Having elected to pay a little bit more for the "Fulfilled by Amazon" option I was surprised when the binoculars turned up in the post totally unwrapped, straight off the shelf in their thin card box as you would buy them from a normal shop, with an address label stuck on. Indeed there was not even the usual circle of sticky tape to keep the box flap shut (it was open) or cellophane wrap which most boxed goods in shops seem to have these days. Two letters I had received the previous day came through the door soaked through, it was just lucky it wasn't raining the morning the binoculars turned up. Frankly, this is unacceptable, even DVDs in a protective DVD case with a cellophane wrapper come packaged up in corrugated cardboard. I have been shopping with or through Amazon for many years and until now everything has been well- if not over-packaged. Fortunately, binoculars, neck-strap, lens caps, soft case and guarantee/instructions were all still present and correct. I have decided not to let this frankly unacceptable delivery practice colour my review of the binoculars themselves - I'd just advise getting them somewhere else. I was under the impression from reviews here that the non-existent packaging process was confined to some sellers who just use Amazon as a shop window, but apparently not. I have left a separate packaging review, I'm surprised they dared invite my comments !
Read more..

19.8.2019

Just got back from a cruise down the Norwegian Fjords and enjoyed looking at the scenery through my old binoculars but realized that they weren't really all that good, so when I got home I treated myself to a new pair of binoculars. The cruise was fantastic and I would happily go again - especially now I have the new binoculars; oh why did I not think of buying them before the cruise!!Compared to my old binoculars (which were supposedly 12 x 50)...... well there is no comparison. The clarity of vision is such that I can see things way way in the distance, perfectly clearly - things that I would have no chance of seeing with my old binoculars - and the field of vision is much wider than my old ones.Just looked out over the fields at the back of my house and seen (small)birds flying around in crystal clear vision - could see their markings very clearly. Not being a bird-watcher I had no idea what they were (although definitely not sparrows, blackbirds, pigeons, gulls, magpies or starlings - or robins - or owls - or eagles) but they were good to watch and almost converted me to being a twitcher! Might even become a train-spotter now! Will have a look at the moon later tonight.If you buy these binoculars you will not be disappointed - not for the price, anyway. I can't say this for certain, but I am pretty sure you could pay a lot more and not get much better quality of vision. OK, not the cheapest you can buy, but certainly not expensive. I bought my old binoculars years ago, but obviously did not pay much for them! The difference is truly amazing.Update:I have now had the binoculars for a couple of weeks and "sold" them to a friend - not physically, but I think she is now going to buy two pairs, one for her husband and one for her brother, she was that impressed.Having bought these, I began to wonder, "have I got a really good bargain here?" and have spent some time researching the matter even more than I did before I bought them! My conclusion is yes, I have got a bargain. For £65 these binoculars are exceptional and, having now used them a lot over the two weeks I have owned them, would say that if I had paid £100 (or even £150) for these binoculars, I would still think I had got a bargain and be very pleased with my purchase!So, if you are thinking of buying a cheaper pair, think again - the extra £10, £20, £30 that you spend on buying these binoculars will be money well spent. And if you are thinking of buying a much more expensive pair of binoculars, also think again. Buy these and you could save yourself hundreds of pounds. OK, if you need a really, really good pair for some reason (perhaps because of your job), it might be worthwhile you spending that extra money, but for the vast, vast majority of us, these binoculars are all you will ever need (for whatever purpose you need them for). They give fantastic quality of vision at a very (very) reasonable price. My old bins have been binned with just one regret - why did I put up with them for so long!
Read more..

20.6.2012

I have had these binoculars for just three days and am very, very impressed with them. I have never owned binoculars before but wanted to start astronomy in a very amateur way. These were highly recommended and reviewed. Sadly, the great british summer has not been favourable for astronomy in the last three days so I can not comment on the ability regarding stargazing but for normal terrestrial use there are fantastic. I didn't really understand what people meant when the said in their reviews that these bins made things look 3D but now I understand, they are so good the view almost looks better than normal eye sight,hard to understand until you try them!Given there high magnification and my desire to use them for astronomy I was conscious that even the slightest movement would ruin any space viewing so decided to buy the following product to attach them to my regular DSLR digital camera tripod.http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B005XXZCR0/ref=oh_details_o02_s00_i00It is the best £10 I have ever spent.The Olympus website and google search does not give much information on how to attach these binoculars to a tripod but it is possible and incredibly easy with this attachment.having done some reading on optics and there inherent problems I am aware that there bins have a VERY, VERY, slight discolouration on the very bottom on the image, nothing to worry about but it is there in a tiny (I mean minuscule way). As I am an amateur this does not bother me but nice to know what has caused it. From my limited reading it is something to do with the manufacture of the glass. It seriously affects less that 1% on the image and can only been seen if you are looking for it, as I was! With such a big field of view this is really not a problem, I only mentioned it as some serious buyers may be wondering if it exists. However, to be fair to Olympus, I have only tried the one pair, this problem/issue may vary my product.I will monitor the review page so if you have any problems just ask and I will answer ASAP.AS I intened to use these mainly on a tripod I wash;t put off buy the slightly heavy weight. i am sure there are heavier models out there but this was not my number one priority but be aware, good glass weighs more hence these are heavy compare to less strong bins. Weight is clearly the price you pay for quality and I am very impressed.Overall, highly recommended and very happy with my purchase (especially as I bought them from Amazon.com (USA) and my dad bought them over for me saving me 30%!)These bins come with a neck strap, four lenses covers and a relatively attractive plane black case with carry strap.TOP TIP - Keep lens covers on when not in use, especially if left on a tripod like mine, I have read/heard horror stories of the sun shining through and starting fires.Happy viewing!
Read more..

9.4.2018

Just got mine today. Very pleased.Nice large 65 degree apparent field of view. (Basically this is how much you can move your eyes to the side before you get to the black edges.) I measured that this is like looking at a 59" TV from 55" away. Very big. A few expensive binoculars seem to go up to around 70 degrees.Tack sharp! I have almost no experience with binoculars but I'm a pro photographer with superb eyesight. This is SHARP. The far corners lose some sharpness but since the apparent field of view is so large my eyes never go anywhere near the edges so all I see is a perfectly sharp image.Really decent build quality. Very solid. 879g /31oz with the cheapo strap that's included.Smooth focus wheel.Some very slim chromatic aberration lines in high contrast scenes (green and purple edges where very dark and very bright parts of the image meet, for example a black object on a bright cloudy sky) but I don't think it would bother me in use, especially considering the price. Hopefully it won't show too much on stars.It's cloudy so I won't be able to see any stars tonight, but I did test looking into a pocket torch on a black background, and it really wasn't bad. A little bit of haze around the torch and one mild reflection, but not bad at all considering the torch was shining directly towards the binoculars.And they have a 3D image that other people mentioned in reviews. It really looks like a 3D movie. Very pretty to look at.I can actually also focus back and forth (a few meters) with just my eyes, without touching the focus wheel, which is interesting.Standard 1/4"-20 tripod screw on the front. Most likely I'll be using this for my soft stretchy camera strap as shown in the photo below.It's also great with my Giottos tripod which has an extension arm. Should be perfect for lying down to look at the stars. I'm using a Joby BH1 head to connect to the screw. Due to the shape of the binoculars, it will be easier to connect to a smaller plate and head, or some sort of other adapter.The 25 years warranty sounds decent.The 10x magnification seems like a nice choice so that I can use it handheld when needed, and also carry it easily. And the 50mm lens size should be bright enough for my uses.Minimum focus is about 4.5 meters / 14.8 feet.The photo really doesn't do it justice! The view is so much nicer when looking with your eyes. But I figure adding the photo is better than nothing.Note: The tripod and thick strap shown in the photos are not included with the binoculars. It did come with a super cheap thin strap.
Read more..

17.4.2019

You can spend a lot of money on binoculars and much like camera lenses, you do get what you pay for but there's a balance between acceptable quality and price. I think these are great value for money and offer more than adequate quality for the casual user.I have a fairly large garden area with multiple bird feeders and already have a great (more expensive) pair of Pentax binoculars that I keep in the house for quickly grabbing and getting a closer look at the birds. However, it got to the point where me and my wife were constantly passing the binoculars to each other to see the birds before they flew away.I bought these 10x50 Olympus binoculars during Amazon's sale so the already cheap price was a little cheaper again and I must say I'm impressed.They don't feel as well made as other more expensive binoculars, the focus wheel isn't as "fast" as other binoculars and the eye cups don't come close enough together for some users BUT for the money the quality is excellent.Coming from a photography background, yes there is slight chromatic abberation along high contrast edges in the background but you have to actively look for that. The bokeh (out of focus area) behind the in focus subject is nicely separated and smooth which helps make the subject stand out. They're nice and bright, I don't really use them in low light situations but they are noticeably brighter than my more expensive bincoculars.The only let down would be size/weight and the accessories. They are big and heavy, couple that with a cheap and thin neck strap that is included and you really wouldn't want to be taking these on a long hike. The strap problem is easily solved, I always attached PeakDesign connectors to my cameras and binoculars so I can use comfy wide PeakDesign straps with them, this helps spread the weight around your neck but if you are looking for a pair of travel binoculars, look elsewhere.If you want a decent pair of binoculars to keep in the kitchen/conservatory to grab to look at wildlife in the garden, these are for you. You won't care about the extra weight or size because they'll be sat on a coffee table. Likewise, if you keep them in your car and take them to a sporting event (motorsport, horseracing, etc) then they're perfect.
Read more..

2.1.2016

I bought this product a couple of weeks back. I compared it primarily to the Celestron 71256 G2 10x50 before buying. The celestron costs cheaper in the US but in India the selling price seems bloated. The olympus however roughly costs the same in both countries. Both the binoculars have 10x zoom which is ideal for sky watching. The quality of optics on Olympus seems better. For instance I viewed the moon and I could see the texture on its surface very clearly. Of course you can not view the craters that clearly. If you think you can watch the rings of saturn with this binocular then you should think again, only a telescope can help you. Next I went to the beach to watch over ships at the far-end of the sea (Marina).Again the quality of optics for viewing was excellent. The field of view is wide. I could sight yachts that were not visible to naked eye. In one case I could zoom in on the 'surfer' too.However when I tried to look at the constellations or any group of stars for that matter, the image shook a lot (yes it is because of my hand moving). It is pretty hard to focus without a tripod as it is heavier than other binoculars. I tried looking at the airplanes but it was difficult to keep moving with them. It is easy on the user while viewing stationary or slow moving objects. I am yet to watch Venus with this.On the physical attributes of the product, the strap to hang this around the neck is small for a tall person like me. The eyepiece lid and the lens lid are not attached to the binoculars so you stand a chance of losing them. I wear glasses, I was worried the product may be useless as I read the eye relief is too small (12 mm only vs the minimum 15mm needed). They were correct the eye relief is indeed less. However the binoculars come with an adjustable dioptre which helps viewing without glasses, and the viewing is just great. People with astigmatism may find it hard though.Update: I used it for bird watching it is good but again felt it heavy. Tried watching Venus the view was shaky.
Read more..

13.10.2015

Just received these bins and took them out for a first field trip. First things first though; the strap which comes with them is worse than useless, it's positively dangerous for the binoculars. If I were to use this strap I would want to stitch or staple the ends to make sure they don't slip free, which I'm sure they would if left as they are. I just threw the strap away and used a quality neck strap I had spare..Right, the binoculars, they are outstanding value for money. You expect a good image with Porro bins, but these exceeded my expectations by a long way for what I paid for them and I did a big 'WOW' on first use. They feel good in the hand as well, comfortable and solid.I found the focus wheel just about right, if anything a little on the stiff side, but rather that than sloppy. The rubber eye cups are fine for me, but I could understand if some might find them a bit softish. They're in the average weight range for Porros at 850g and with the good quality wide neck strap I used I didn't find them tiring at all.After the quick initial field trip I spent a whole day with them round my neck walking the cliffs around my seaside home observing everything from hovering kestrels to a pod of dolphins rolling across the bay, a search and rescue helecopter doing what looked like training out at sea, and a big 3 masted 'tall ship' just about on the horizon. These binoculars returned an excellent image in all these different applications. They represent outstanding value money and I'd recommend them to anyone for general purpose use. By the way, they have 'Field 6.5' stamped on the side which if my trigenometry is about right should be around 56 metres at half a kilometer. I checked this using some prominent landmarks and using the Google Earth ruler on my PC at home found that the 56m field at half a kilometer is sopt on.So definitely 4½ out of 5 for these binoculars. Such a pity about the supplied strap. A decent strap would definitely raise them to a 5/5
Read more..

14.9.2016

Ok its not until you have had at least 3 sets of dodgy Chinese BINs with iffy optics and double vision that when you spend a few extra quid on a decent pair the difference really hits you!I cannot begin to describe how impressed I am with these optics, stunningly clear vision a perfectly correlated set of lenses everything looks like its in 3d!The 50mm lenses and whatever they coat them in pulls in the light really well, so well in fact that looking down my garden some 50 yds in pitch black of night I can actually see the detail of my deck and shed as if it were twilight, ok its not night vision but its enough to keep an eye out for Charlie and know when its time to get the gun out!Now I haveseen what a good set of optics can do I wish that I had maybe gone for something slightly higher powered say a 12 or 15x but then I doubt they would be as light or as compact as these DPS-1'sFor hunting and general use without spending £2k on those brands normally found in my local gunshop, these Olympus 10x50's are exceptional VFM and the deal I got from Amazon was around £40 less than the nearest high street stockist.Lets face it you need hands steadier than a brain surgeon to use anything above 15x and the wage packet of said surgeon to afford Swarovski's anyway so these are undoubtedly the best set of bins I've ever had and I expect to get many years use from them.I don't think I've ever paid more than £30 for a set of bins and they all end up in landfill, buy cheap buy twice I think is the saying.This time I'm totally satisfied but I would have given 5* had I found a 15x pair for the same money.For stargazing they are not,I was originally looking at getting 8x42 hunting bins but decided on the 10x50 Olympus as the brand was reputable and has a 25 yr warranty.
Read more..

4.1.2016

First off, this is a genuine Olympus. That is saying a lot.I'll quickly summarize different aspects of the binoculars so you can make up your mind whether its a pro or a con.1. Size- Its fairly large, about the volume of a DSLR with a 70-300 lens attached. This will take up some space in your bag, as well as on your person when you are carrying it.2. Build Quality- I would say fair. Everything fits snugly, and the knob is well damped. But the quality of rubber used for the external layer feels a little cheap, but good quality nonetheless.3. Magnification- Very good. Can see clear detail of birds and animals from a fair distance off.4. Image Quality- This is average. The plus is that the exit pupil is large,so the image is bright and large. On the negative side, there is distortion on the edge of the image circle, and the lack of an ED element shows. Images lack contrast, and sometimes feel overly bright, and prolonged usage tends to strain the eyes.5. Targeting and Stability- I have not had any issues with stability. A 10X magnification basically amounts to handling a 500mm lens. A reasonably experienced person should be able to hold it steady and track a bird without any issues. On the flip side, the narrow field of view does make initially homing in onto what you have seen with your naked eye, a little more difficult, as one tends to point the binoculars in a slightly different direction.6. VFM?- Absolutely. For this price its a steal. If you overlook the slightly inferior image contrast, this stands very well against pricier brands' products. Use is with love and respect, and it should give you years' of trouble free service.
Read more..

28.4.2012

We've owned a pair of Bushnell 10x42 Natureview binoculars for a few years - and they're superb. We use them mainly for watching birds and wildlife in the garden and the surrounding fields. We wanted a second pair of binoculars to keep upstairs for those occasions when we spot something out of the bedroom window but we didn't feel we could justify the cost of another pair of the Natureviews. We were torn between the Olympus DPS-1 and the Bushnell Falcons but chose the Olympus on the basis of the many positive reviews.They're twice the size of the Natureviews but the same weight; very comfortable. The image is bright and the focus is sharp. But the depth of field is very narrow compared to the Natureviews.This gives the image a very flattened appearance which is quite odd. It also means that, if your subject is moving, you're constantly having to readjust the focus. And, although the image dead centre is sharp, it distorts to the sides so you have to keep moving to keep your subject in the middle. By contrast, with the Natureviews, once you've found your subject it can move towards you, away from you, up, down, left or right and it's still pin sharp.So now I know the difference between expensive(ish) and budget(ish) binoculars. These aren't bad for the money but if you want an excellent pair of binoculars, spend a bit more and get the Bushnell Natureview 10x42s.I'd love to know what those Bushnell Falcons are like...
Read more..

27.1.2012

In response to K. Gill's review... The 60-70 markings are there as a guide to aid the setting of the distance between the two barrels of the binocular, this is known as the interpupillary distance. The centre-to-centre distance between an adult person's eyes average between 60 to 70mm which is what these markings represent.The goal is to have the center of the left and right eyepieces directly in front of the pupils of your left and right eyes. But people's eyes differ. Some are wide spaced and others are closer together. So binoculars are hinged to let you adjust the interpupillary distance to match the distance between the pupils of your eyes.Hold the binocular up to your eyes and move thebarrels closer together or farther apart until the two images become one circle.When you see one circle, you have the interpupillary distance set correctly and the markings will then indicate exactly what your interpupillary distance is in millimetres. That's all there is to it.As for the binoculars themselves, I cannot fault them and they are the best pair I've ever owned. I use them for looking at aircraft and for astronomy. They are also an ideal all round binocular for everyday use. They are of a quality finish and the pair I received are Olympus branded only, there is no sign of a Coleman logo on them anywhere! A top quality piece of kit 10/10!
Read more..

19.10.2016

First Binoculars ever. Bought it for Target Archery. The old eyes can no longer clearly see those small arrows 70 meters away. Works well, everything is up close and sharp. Sure does highlight how shaky your hands are.Only little complaint pertains to the neck strap. The Trooper has some weight to it, and the strap digs into your skin. Solved the problem by sliding on a neoprene pad. Pity Olympus didn't think of including one.For those who have been asking if there is a hole to mount a tripod, the answer is yes, BUT it could prove a bit tricky to achieve. The hole is behind the cap with the OLYMPUS. Unscrew it.You will have to turn the mount on your tripod to vertical (90 degrees).I have a Nikon tripod with a detachable base plate which attaches to the bottom of the camera if you were using one, but unfortunately the mounting screw came up a bit short, couldn't reach the hole on the Trooper, so I had to find a longer one. If you don't have any laying around, should be able to find one at the hardware store. Take the binoculars along and find one that fits. The depth of the hole in the binoculars seem to go on forever, so a 1 inch screw/bolt should do the job. .See photos..If you are using Chrome, the photos might fail to launch. Use the Microsoft browser.
Read more..

26.2.2015

Very happy with these binoculars. The image is sharp and clear, easy to find objects in view, the dial is easy to turn, and I like the non slip feel.It was a toss up with these or the Celestron UpClose G2 10x50 Porro Binocular 71256 (cheaper). I decided based on feedback to get these and glad I did.I wanted binoculars for my downstairs. I already have an old pair (8x42) upstairs along with the Celestron 25x70. Most of my viewing is in the house looking out. I have the city below I like to look at.Looking out I've seen birds flying miles away that I couldn't see with just my eyes. At night, the vision is just as clear. I can see planes or helicopters flying miles away. I looked at the moon and see the craters.Looking into the black of the night, was surprised to see clusters of stars I cannot see with the naked eye. I've never taken my strong 25x70 binoculars outside but now will to look in the sky above. Again, I enjoy looking out at the city below both day and night.UPDATE:After getting these binoculars I no longer liked the older 8x42 I had for upstairs and ordered another pair of thes. I'm still very happy with them
Read more..

10.5.2011

The rubber eyecups on my last binoculars disintegrated and there was something wrong with the internal focusing mechanism. I only had them a couple of years and even then thay didn't get a great amount of use. But that'll teach me for being a skinflint for only spending £12 on them. So in the bin they went and I went looking for a replacement. After searching lots of binocular sites for reviews on something decent, this Olympus pair seemed to crop up a lot and got some favourable reviews. So I decided to take the plunge and ordered from Amazon who had the best price at the time. My first impression was how light they were compared to previous binoculars I've had in the past.This coupled with the good design and rubberised coating made them extremely comfortable to use for long periods. The focusing is smooth and quick and the optics give a bright and sharp image. The only downside, not to the binoculars themselves, is the rather cheap case and thin neckstrap but I'm sure I can replace. So overall, if you are on a budget for decent big name binoculars then you can't go wrong with these.
Read more..

28.4.2016

Very good pair of bins, had tried 8x50s and was disappointed as most twitch sites recommend this size, however I find the 10x50s far better suited for my needs, these have a wide viewing angle good quality image and magnification. Sturdy build and not heavy, even when you check the specs against the 8x50 these are not much heavier, also the size is not huge, no they won't fit in your pocket but certainly spot on for bird watching and other uses. I have several german optic bins from a very old pair of 7x 30s, and a pair old 20x50, the 7 x30 I had as a child for twitching and they were a hand down from my grandad, the 20x50 were my dads, and they are heavy old beasts.the 7x30s are old and need a repair to a loose front lens, these however are at the back of a little accessed storage unit and I wanted a pair for watching the swans about to hatch their signets, My initial concerns were the 10x50s may be heavy like the old 20x50s but optics have moved on a long way. To summarise, ideal bins, light weight, great optics, superb magnification, bag, lens cap and strap. Excellent purchase.
Read more..
Terms and ConditionsPrivacy Policy