logo

Info

Reviewbucket.co.uk scanned the internet for Polar M460 HR reviews.
You can find all Polar M460 HR reviews and ratings on this page.

Read the reviews.

Analysis

For Polar M460 HR, 33 customer reviews collected from 4 e-commerce sites, and the average score is 4.2.

Detailed seller stats;
Amazon has 21 customer reviews and the average score is 3.9. Go to this seller.
Argos has 2 customer reviews and the average score is 4.5. Go to this seller.
Bikeinn has 8 customer reviews and the average score is 4.9. Go to this seller.
Ebay has 2 customer reviews and the average score is 4.5. Go to this seller.

Similar Items

26.7.2017

As a fairly casual cyclist (meaning not a member of any clubs) I cycle to keep fit and I also have a turbo trainer for indoors although I'm not trying to break any records or train for an event, I just don't like cycling in the rain.What's my point? Well up to now I've used wahoo equipment (tickr, cadence sensor, rflkt) which combine to give a very comprehensive record of your workout with cadence, speed, bpm, distance if outside, etc. It works well but it's fussy because before you begin you have to fire up the app, wait for all the sensors to "check in" via bluetoooth, then off you go. I thought this one might be better because you can turn it on and ride, no sync required for a workout - in contrast to wahoo,you sync this AFTER a workout, via pc or phone.It lacks a cadence sensor but don't let that concern you - it is compatible with many third party ones - including thankfully my wahoo one. This is good for indoor cycling too, because the wahoo cadence sensor does cadence from the pedal and speed from the back wheel in one single wireless unit (bluetooth LE). I am happy about this - indoor and outdoor workouts recorded fully!The screen is a weird e-paper and you can see it refresh. Not a problem, just an observation. It's very much like the old pebble watch screen. Saves power? Compared to simple black LCD? Hmm..battery life is exceptional though! Mine's still full I think after three short rides!The unit can actually display a lot of data on its screen - zones, workout info, a calendar with number of exercises per day, etc. Rather hoping that will be improved with time too, would be nice to see some charts on there!But, if you're a data obsessed nerd, then after you exercise you have to somehow get the data off. That's where you hit the problems that are currently keeping this item at four stars for me.1) syncing with a phone is fussy. You're always going to hit problems when syncing anything with bluetooth ever, or so I am convinced. I've had to reboot my phone to make it work on more than one occasion. Notifications on another phone seem to work OK though. Still testing this, still unconvinced. It's going to depend on your phone.It's worth noting that syncing by USB on a PC is absolutely fine and for me, it's the preferred method. Both methods go the exact same place so you can try it on phone, but if your phone is sulking that day, just use the PC. It stores data on the cloud. It won't duplicate it or anything like that. The unit can store a lot of workouts too so no worries if you can't upload it that day or even that week.2) This is a biggie for me. I use runkeeper and have used runkeeper for years. It isn't compatible at all with runkeeper. It works well with strava but not at all with runkeeper. We desperately need more third party support from polar. I even tried export to kst or whatever it's called but runkeeper was not having any of it. Big disappointment, because either I stay with wahoo which supports runkeeper AND strava, or I abandon runkeeper.Polar - please add runkeeper (and others!) - it can't be that hard surely.Worth noting that I also record into google fit and that works perfectly well too.So - summary. Works well, can be a bit fussy when syncing but not that big a deal and will likely happen to any bluetooth unit, and needs more third party support. I can definitely recommend it if you use strava.
Read more..

24.8.2017

I don't cycle because I want to lower my heartrate or tot up km on a graph but...it's certainly nice to see an improvement over time. I rode without a bike computer for years - now I don't even go to the shops without this one.As I've never had a bike computer before this one, I can't really compare it to similar products - hopefully this review will help inform other people like me, who are debating the merits of getting one.Previously, I'd use my phone's GPS to track long rides - this wasn't great in terms of accuracy, and it also drained my phone battery, which isn't ideal, particularly if there was an emergency where I'd have to call someone or take a picture of a cute cow.The m460 has awesome battery life - unless you're cycling over 16hrs at a stretch, you're unlikely to run out. The GPS tracking seems super accurate in terms of location and distance - much better than my phone. It also uses its own barometer for elevation tracking, since GPS elevation data can be a bit spotty - it used to be pretty irritating to use apps that couldn't properly record the excruciating hill climbs I was making...Polar Flow is an extremely cool app that integrates perfectly with the M460...it can also be used with Polar's other trackers, but I can't comment on how well it works with those. It consolidates the information the M460 provides and comes with a lot of extra feature, such as sharing your workouts with other Flow users. It offers a lot of customisability, so no matter what your routine is, you should be able to represent it as a training page on Flow.It also allows for live Strava integration, but this is a premium feature - you do get 2 months free subscription, though, so it's a good way to decide if the extra immediacy is worth it.The M460 has buttons rather than a touch screen, which I actually prefer when I'm on the road - in winter I'll be wearing gloves, so a capacitive screen probably wouldn't work with them.I must admit I don't fully understand and haven't completely explored all the power recording options the M460 offers - this is something I'll have to learn as I become more serious about training. Heart rate lines up with what I know about my resting BPM from the doctor, and the power levels seem fairly easy to grasp. There's a motivational aspect to having a bike computer - it makes you pay attention to these metrics and adds, in my opinion, another layer of satisfaction and fun to the activity of cycling.Very impressed.
Read more..

18.9.2017

I've been using this now for quite a while out on my regular rides and it has performed really well in most areas, there are a few niggles though.Set up was really easy and the Polar Flow app is really quite good, so is the website. You can configure the data screens easily via the website or the app, but you can't configure them directly using the device, so bear this in mind if you need to make any changes on the go. Configuring the data screens is a straighforward process though. You can choose up to 4 data options per screen and you can add loads of screens to scroll through to your hearts content. It will connect to Bluetooth devices as well like cadence sensors (I used a Wahoo cadence sensor and it picked it up straight away)and power meters etc. Just be aware that it won't connect to Ant+ devices, so if you already have an Ant+ device already, this may not be the right device for you.In use, the data screens are very clear, it is also easy to scroll through using the buttons on the right hand side. Accuracy wise, the GPS is great and very accurate. It uses an system called assisted GPS that updates a GPS location file every time you sync it (via the web service) so you typically get a GPS fix in usually about 5 seconds which is great.It works perfectly with Strava segments too which is quite good considering the price of the unit, it's simple to connect to your phone to get smart notifications on the unit which also work perfectly. The heart rate strap is very good too and just as accurate as my Garmin one so no complaints there.The only thing that lets it down for me is it just looks a bit cheap. It's supposed to have a 'carbon fibre' look to it, it doesn't work in my opinion and just looks like cheap plastic. The screen is also a bit small for the size of the unit itself, there is a large space at the top which the screen could have been extended into.However, let's not detract from the fact that this is quite a comprehensive GPS unit for the money. It's GPS tracking is more accurate than my more expensive Garmin device, and you have the bonus of Strava segments and also smart notifications. And as long as you're ok with Bluetooth, it will work with loads of power meters, speed and cadence sensors etc. So if you're in the market for a really good value bike GPS, this is a really good option.
Read more..

2.9.2017

I’ve always used Garmin GPS bike products before (and been more than happy with them) but when I was offered this POLAR M460 GPS Bike Computer I was interested to try it out. It’s not cheap but has some functions my current Garmin so I thought I would see how it compared.I must admit that I find the Garmin easier to use – the buttons and menu system seems slightly more intuitive – but then it doesn’t do quite as much. It’s ok to use just not quite as simple.In the box you get the bike computer itself, plus the usual item to fit it to your bike’s handlebars, a USB charging lead (to charge the device and/or link to the pc) and then the heart rate monitoring device and strap.The small 12 page instruction booklet comes in 15 different languages. It’s ok but only gives you the bare minimum to get you started.The actual working of the Polar Bike computer I found really good – it has a clear screen and seems accurate with your route and mileage and your heart rate. I measured this against my other devices and it performed well. I’m not currently signed up to Strava but a couple of friends are and thought that this would be a very useful device and were looking into its usefulness to them.All in all it seems to be an excellent device once you’ve fully explored its intricacies and understand the extra features it can give you.
Read more..

27.7.2020

The truth is that I have been disappointed, mainly with its screen and it is that the simple fact that when switching between screen and screen there is a kind of fading of the previous information (I can explain better, example: if you paint with a fat marker or pen ink ... a sheet and then you wet it, the paint "runs" and spreads downwards, as it is the same thing that happens with the screen) he has made me return the product although I have also had many problems to see well The screen in the sun also the way in which the data is distributed and the excessive size it has so that the screen is half of what the GPS occupies in total already make too many negative points. Even so,I really liked the heart rate monitor and the application. I definitely think that other options like the Garmin 130 * which is even cheaper with a heart rate monitor on this page * are worth more than the polar m460, which for my taste leaves something to be desired, but as who says: to taste the colors. * Regarding the Garmin 130: the screen looks much better and is of much better quality in general than the Polar M460, it has a rectangular / vertical layout that allows you to put much more data than the square screen of the Polar M460 and is smaller although the screen is no smaller. *
Read more..

16.10.2017

I'm a very casual rider and have tried various apps to measure and log journeys I've made to see if I'm improving in speed, etc and they've never been immensely accurate or reliable - I was interested in this to see how it measured my performance though I realise it's suitable for someone of a pro level as well as there are features that are probably beyond what I personally need but always good to have these once I've realised how to use it to its full potential.It fits to my bike and I find the buttons handy as I wear gloves now it's getting colder and I don't think a touch screen would be as easy if it involved taking gloves off each time.It's fairly easy to navigate through - I've read the instructions several times and still refer to them to work out exactly what to do each time but as I've never had anything like this before it's very new to me!I like that it can record your rides and you're able to compare performances - it can work alongside the app which is also great and unlocks more possibilities.I will update once I've got the hang of this more but for now I am very impressed and will continues to use!
Read more..

2.9.2017

I've spent quite a lot of time with this but I really have struggled to like it. The main reason for this is that I do not find the operation / menu system intuitive. In fact I have found it almost impossible on occasion such that I've had to put it down and had to refer to the manual (again). I'm sure it's down to me but I think there are too many functions / data available which leads to too many screen options resulting in my difficulty in navigating the system.On the bike the display is easy to read, but I have found it difficult to operate the buttons with gloves on.I've had quite a few problems with the software (Windows 10) with my computer deciding the 'USB device is not recognised'and despite several reinstall the problem continues. The Strava link is very good should one feel the need.The heart rate monitor is comfortable to wear and the device's various heart rate data is both useful and (I think) accurate.I feel that it's 3 stars, due to the complexity of the user interface, but that may be an issue down to me so I've settled on 4.
Read more..

15.9.2017

1) Overall: Light, well designed, professional - even compared to garmins, but costly and perhaps unncessary.2) Construction: I have no complaints about the quality and durability of the hardware - both the unit and the heart rate sensor are surprisingly light3) Technology: Incredible and excessive: Strava live segments are a billiant idea if you ride similar routes a lot of the time. The heart rate monitor can become nothing more than an inconvenience or worry for an amateur cyclist. Also the monitor seemed to give only elevated readings - Mine hardly dropped below 100 when resting.4) Buttons: 5 Buttons are more intuitve and simple to use than a garmin with a nice pressability and feedback.5)Set-up: Pairing is an innovative process which seems to use NFC, whereby you touch the heart rate sensor to the front of the unit and firmware set-up is an easy but meticulous process.Things to note: Mount incompatible with garmin devices,.
Read more..

30.12.2017

I already had a Garmin Edge 25 for tracking my rides but this did not have the heart monitor and I was interested in seeing my level of fitness and performance on my rides. The polar is very similar to the Garmin, (neither of these are map integrated devices). It records the distance and coordinates of the rides and these can then be analysed using an App. The Polar also has a heart rate monitor to collect the extra data. As someone who is out of shape and getting older I need to take care that I don't overdo it. Heart rate is helpful to plan my rides more effectively and to see that I am putting in the right amount of effort.I am very happy with the Polar and it is of comparable price to the Garmin Edge 25 with the addition of the heart rate monitor.I just wish that all the GPS based devices would start to come down in price as I still find them a bit on the expensive side.
Read more..

11.5.2018

Replaced a CS600 with WIND strap as I wanted uploads to Polar Flow via my mobile phone (Android) rather than having to manually enter every session. I use mainly for the treadmill and erg to monitor HR based intervals, although also for general cardio training. Prefer over a watch (V800) as don't like keep looking at my wrist, anyway is much easier to have HR in front of you.Very clear display and accurate HR.Satellite acquisition fast (although don't intend really to use outdoors much)First time pairing (required only once) can be a little fiddly.I also like that it turns off the display automatically after an inactive period to save charge. This had to be done manually on the CS600.

13.4.2019

I ordered my Polar M460 from Amazon.uk on Wednesday evening, it was delivered to my door in Thailand at 11:00am on the following Friday - with the time difference, that's less than 36hrs. The 'Pre-Paid Duty' ensured I knew exactly how much I was paying (half the local price) - Stunning delivery and a great price.As for the M460, I'm replacing my current Polar CS500, the M460 has more functions but to be honest the ergonomics of the CS500 was fabulous, its a shame Polar could not have added the new functions into the superb CS500 format.

22.7.2017

I purchased the M460 because I'm familiar with the Polar products, Apps and the cost was reasonable. The M460 is pitched at both the causal and competitive rider.What I like best about the M460 is the live Strava segments. You can upload twenty of your favourite segment rides and the M460 will measure and log each performance ride and tell you how you performed whilst riding. This is an excellent training tool if you want to improve your sprints and climbs. I highly recommend this product.

5.9.2017

Well it eventually did what it said on the box and tracked what I was doing. I found set up to be fussy, it took several goes; but after that everything appears to be OK. Issues with the Android version of the App (PolarFlow) - which I notice I'm not the only one. Maybe the iOS version is more solid. Other than that appears to be a good and interesting product that will hopefully encourage more riding.

23.1.2021

Really delighted with this computer, perfect autonomy for my bike rides (around 5-6 hours of use per week without recharging), screen can be configured as desired according to use, excellent readability, light but strong. I highly recommend pairing it with a cardio belt and pedaling frequency sensor. Fast delivery times I recommend

21.7.2020

Argos have advertised this item as a running watch. This is not the case, it’s a cycle attachment that records GPS and heart rate monitor. This attaches to bicycle and you cannot wear on your wrist. Having said that, Polar to exceptionally good heart rate monitors that are ECG accurate and this is excellent for a keen cyclist.
Terms and ConditionsPrivacy Policy