logo

Info


Reviewbucket.co.uk scanned the internet for AMD Ryzen 7 1800X reviews.
You can find all AMD Ryzen 7 1800X reviews and ratings on this page.

Read the reviews.

Analysis


For AMD Ryzen 7 1800X, 221 customer reviews collected from 2 e-commerce sites, and the average score is 4.8.

Detailed seller stats;
Amazon has 218 customer reviews and the average score is 4.8. Go to this seller.
Ebay has 3 customer reviews and the average score is 5. Go to this seller.

Detail


Click to list all products in this category.

Similar Items

2.6.2017

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PROMemory: Corsair Vengeance DDR4-3200 16GB (2 x 8GB)Cooler: Thermaltake Contac Silent 21 w/ Akasa ViperGraphics: MSI GeForce 1070Ryzen has had its share of teething problems. I've heard about the struggles that some have had to get their memory clocking fast, and indeed I had to put a little work in too.For reasons that elude me, my motherboard cannot automatically determine the timings of my RAM unless I set the BIOS to XMP mode. The defaults it comes up with prevent the system from going above the BIOS default RAM frequency of 2133 MHz. However, the XMP mode would run the RAM at the maximum rated speed (3200 MHz) which the system isn't capable of. Based on what I've read,this is a common issue and most people can't quite reach 3200 MHz, settling for 2933 MHz.In order to get my RAM ticking away even slightly faster than 2133 MHz, I had to do the following in the BIOS:(1) Forced the RAM voltage to the rated voltage (in my case 1.35V; the BIOS was trying to default it to 1.2V)(2) Manually set the RAM timings (the BIOS also defaulted these wrong; note that the XMP BIOS feature will probably tell you your RAM's timings on-screen, plus it's printed on the RAM itself)(3) Incrementally tried each faster RAM speed until the system became unstable (I couldn't go above 2933 MHz)I tested my memory stability using the memtest86 tool. If a certain RAM speed could survive a whole pass without throwing errors I deemed it stable, though arguably it should be run for much longer (overnight perhaps). Prime95 is another stability testing tool that I would recommend.My first impression with regards to temperatures was worrying; I noticed the CPU running much hotter than I would have expected given its TDP, but then I noticed an AMD community article about how the Ryzen 7 1700X and 1800X have their temperatures offset by 20 degrees (why this is, I don't understand). The Ryzen Master software gives you the correct temperature; with other temperature software you will need to do the subtraction yourself. The maximum I've been able to hit is about 58 degrees Celsius with Prime95; pretty impressive.I've seen a lot of benchmarks from big YouTube tech channels that paint the 1800X as very hot; I suspect they didn't know about the temperature offset. AMD really did mess that one up; had they been more proactive in telling people about it, or not adding an offset at all, it would have made Ryzen seem more appealing, I think.If you prefer to use a balanced power mode on Windows, know that there is one specifically written for the Ryzen CPUs that you can download from the AMD community website.I neglected to do many benchmarks to determine an actual difference to me, but others have done benchmarks that show that while the 1800X is not the fastest CPU, it is fast and great value. It did occur to me to check single-threaded performance; this CPU isn't close to the Intel i7-7700K which holds the crown at time of writing, but I felt that double the cores and great value made the 1800X a better choice going into the future.Something that surprised me is that the 1800X and, perhaps more importantly the motherboard, work with Linux (Fedora 25) out of the box, despite being so new!I'm glad that there is competition in the CPU market once again; everyone benefits and I'm looking forward to seeing what AMD and Intel will do in the next couple of years.EDIT: it's worth pointing out, since many don't, that setting your memory frequency above 2666 MHz when using this CPU is an *overclock*, which apparently voids your CPU warranty (even if your memory is capable of going faster, as is true in my case). Just something to bear in mind! Be sure to look up the maximum supported memory frequency on your CPU's specification.
Read more..

7.5.2017

So far I've been impressed with this CPU. So far, it has been running smoothly/stably on an Asus ROG Crosshair VI Hero motherboard, mated with an Nvidia GTX 1070 graphics card and 16 GB of G.Skill's Flare-X 3200MHz CAS14 latency memory offering for AMD processors. In my case, I am running linux - specifically, Mint 18 Cinnamon with kernel 4.10 installed (to address known AMD issues with older kernels.) Some linux-specific observations:Performance: I purchased this CPU as a replacement/upgrade from an Intel i7-4790k. In my case, my reason for switching was to improve compiler times. In my application, I saw a reasonable performance improvement, with C/C++ project compile times dropping from about 5m30s to about 4m.Obviously, your mileage will vary based on the type of work you are doing and the amount of concurrent processing your application can effectively utilize. Single threaded applications on the 1800x don't feel any more zippy than with the 4790k, so I'd suggest that if you are looking for max performance for more 'typical' applications, the i7-7700k might still be your best bet.CPU packaging/quality: Compared to the i7 processors, this CPU physically feels really solid. Check out the de-lidding videos of this processor, and you'll see that the packaging is pretty beefy in comparison to what Intel offers. In my case, I was able to put the same CPU cooler on the AMD as I was previously using on the 4790k (not overclocked) and I found that the AMD CPU temps (as subjectively reported by the cpu) came in at about 10 degrees cooler at full load. Not bad for a CPU that is dissipating more total power. I also really like the AMD motherboard heatsink mounting design - there is no need to place brackets/screws under the motherboard, so installation is quite easy in comparison to the Intel CPUs.Linux support: As stated earlier, the CPU seems to run well under linux with kernel 4.10. I haven't run into any stability issues, kernel panics, etc. Some minor quibbles - per-core CPU temps are not available to lmsensors via the linux kernel, so you won't get the same level of CPU temp granularity that you may have grown used to with the Intel CPUs. Would love to see AMD put some time into exposing that data in linux so that enthusiasts can more closely monitor CPU performance.Cons: By far, the biggest drawback these CPUs have relative to Intel is memory support. 3rd party benchmarks indicate that this processor benefits significantly from faster memory (at least in earlier CPU/BIOS firmware versions). Unfortunately, memory that can run stably at 3200 MHz is hard to find and requires manual tuning/overclocking. Furthermore, memory will not run at those speeds if you put more than 2 sticks of RAM in the machine. So, at this time, if you are interested in using high performance memory, you are limited to 16 GB of ram. For my application, this is a significant drawback, but I am hopeful that AMD and the memory market will collectively sort this out and start offering 32+ GB high performance memory solutions at some point in the future.
Read more..

19.2.2018

I bought this to upgrade my aging i7 processor which was really struggling to handle heavily edited and graded 4k footage. Before I had to rely on a proxy workflow as I wasn't even able to scrub through my video without heavily dropped frames. Now I can happily say that I have no issues scrubbing through various 4k footage taken from multiple different cameras (Sony, Panasonic, Mavic, and GoPro). The 1800x has really become a big time saver as I don't even need to use proxies 95% of the time. I was contemplating on getting the i7 8700k, which based on what I have read, performs better than the 1800x. However, I decided to go with AMD for multiple reasons:1. AMD will be releasing new AM4 socket processors until at least 2020.That means I don't have to spend additional money buying another motherboard2. Two more cores makes this more future proof than the 8700k's 6 cores. Im betting on the fact that the 1800x loses out to the 8700k in multithreaded applications due to poor optimization on the software side. As more cores become the norm, applications will begin to fully utilize the extra cores.3. I was worried about how Spectre and Meltdown will impact the performance on the 8700k once Intel chips get patched.4. Support AMD to promote computer competitiveness.I would give the 1800x 4.5 stars because it doesn't overclock well. I managed to only get 4ghz stable and unless you won the chipset lottery, you would be hard pressed to get anything stable beyond 4ghz. Memory support is also lacking - I have 32gb of Corsair Vengeance 3200mhz but i can only clock it to 2400mhz. This is disappointing because Ryzen processors really perform at their best with higher clocked memory due to the infinity fabric. It is not really AMD's fault for the lack of memory support, as most memory manufacturers are optimized to run on Intel due to Intel's sheer dominance over the years. And forget trying another set of memory, have you seen the prices (thank you crypto miners!).Anyways, I am extremely happy and impressed with this chip and big props to AMD for finally releasing a product that is competitive with Intel. I am excited to see what they have in store for the future.
Read more..

19.9.2018

The Ryzen 7 1800X has been an incredible upgrade for my new photo-editing (and future video-editing) workstation, way above and beyond the i5 I've been working with in my iMac for 8 years. I was worried at first about the higher voltage, but everything has been running without a hitch for over a month, so I expect it to continue past the one-year mark this way. I combined this processor with the ASUS Prime X370-Pro motherboard (X370 chipset for solid expansion, seeing as I expected to need a wifi card, sound card, and capture card in time) and the combo worked perfectly on first boot.I experimented with streaming Fallout 4 at 1080p highest graphics settings and high encoding, with ~25% CPU utilization in OBS,with FO4 only occasionally falling to 45-50 fps. Raw photo editing performance has been fantastic too, with the only bottleneck seeming to be PCIe and SATA write times for huge files. The real test will be with video-editing as I hope to expand into that type of work soon, one of the reasons besides stream transcoding I decided on multicore performance over single-core performance of Intel.Even though the processor was shipped separately from the rest of my parts for my workstation and wasn't set to be expedited, it ended up coming within a couple days, earlier than everything else. That was a pleasant surprise. I definitely recommend ordering from OutletPC, everything worked out so well.Parts used in combination with the AMD Ryzen 7 1800X:ASUS Prime X370-Pro motherboardbe quiet! BK021 Dark Rock 4 CPU Cooler Fan32GB (2x16GB) Kingston Technology HyperX FURY Black 2666MHz DDR4Intel SSD 760P Series (256GB, M.2 80mm PCIe 3.0 x4, 3D2, TLC)Crucial MX300 120GB SSDEVGA GeForce GTX 1060 SC GAMING ACX 2.0 6GB GDDR5Seasonic FOCUS Plus 850 Platinum SSR-850PX 850W 80+ Platinum ATX12V & EPS12V Full Modular power supplyEDUP Wifi Card AC1200Mbps 2.4GHz/5GHz Dual Band PCI Express (PCIe) Wireless Adapter Network Card
Read more..

17.4.2017

Coming from a Phenom II X4 that could get to 3.8 GHz on a great day, this is a crazy jump in speed. The last 2 systems that I have built for friends were both i7 7700k, but I insisted upon waiting for AMD. I have this at 3.95 GHz on 1.38V, with 63C under a Prime95 smallFFT load or 57C under a Prime95 blended load under a Corsair 115i GTX with 70F ambient. I was able to get 4.1 GHz Prime95 smallFFT stable for an hour, but this was mostly because I didn't grasp how the voltage controls worked in UEFI and the chip was pushing itself to insane voltages (I saw 1.5-1.6 on HWMon, and all of the other values that it has shown me for voltages have been accurate, temps were 72-74C with +20C offset taken into account).3.95GHz/1.38 represents my comfort point for a daily driver. Have not been able to get it to POST with memory clocked higher than 2667, though I have a 64 GB kit and have not tried loosening timings or going over stock volts on the RAM. I am running the 4/6/17 BIOS on an ASUS Prime x370 board, and will wait to see what the May update brings before I push the RAM too hard.GF has a 7700k under water (Corsair h110i), and we will put my RX480 in that when Vega comes out. That will allow us to properly OC her rig with the IGP turned off, which should be really interesting for benchmarking the two top of the line desktop chips head to head with max OCs in place.I am getting set up to run a large slate of audio conversion (I use MediaMonkey gold to convert my FLAC collection to store on my mobile devices), and if I can think of a way to post that as a sort of competitive benchmark I will. For that kind of load, this chip really shines. For gaming, a 1600X or 1500X is far more bang for your buck.
Read more..

13.4.2017

I've essentially been waiting for this thing ever since the end of the FX glory days. Maybe I've been waiting for this thing since the Athlon XP days. I have always preferred AMD simply because they have gone for elegance and efficiency over brute force and rising price tags. This processor is a beautiful vindication of that philosophy.It is taking my gaming FPS to a new level, but beyond that, it is just an amazing desktop processor. Photoshop and video editing have become exciting applications, because it's just amazing to see how well this thing handles those tasks. You can certainly get more FPS out of an Intel chip. You can definitely make the ultimate gaming rig with an Intel.But one day you might wake up and realize that you spend 2-3 times as much money just to exceed 60 FPS at 4k resolution, but you don't even notice the difference in your everyday applications.This is the best summary I can think of: it's a Nissan GTR. Do you want to go really fast? You could buy a Ferrari. It will scream across the track. But it will look a little silly at the grocery store. But you could pay half the price, or less, get something practical, and still scream across the track, only a little bit slower than something purpose-built to race. If that makes any sense to you, this is probably the processor you want.
Read more..

5.4.2018

For the price what you're getting with this CPU is absolutely fantastic, 8 cores! I was able to get this running at a stable 4.0ghz with a 280mm rad liquid cooler running at around 40°c idle and 70°c under heavy load which is a little disappointing I was expecting a little more overclocking capability.However there were some issues when getting this CPU. One of these issues is ram, there are not many sticks of ram that will run at their advertised speeds with these new motherboards, it was a real hassle to get my ram running at around 3000mhz as I was trying to use the same ram that I used with my previous Intel build. So before you buy definitely check the list of ram kits that have been tested with the motherboard that you are buying along with this CPU.I have also had weird issues where I will turn my computer one and it will instantly reboot which never happened with my old intel.Overall this CPU performs about the same as a 6700k in gaming but absolutely smashes it in multicore tasks and workloads along with easily being able to stream and game at the same time. You really can't go wrong with this one.
Read more..

6.4.2017

After recently upgrading to the new Sony A99II 42-megapixel Full Frame SLT camera, my old Intel Quad Core i7 3770K wasn't cutting it anymore -- especially when batch processing north of 100 raw image files after an event.Switching from Mac to Windows was a bit scary 5 years ago, but to this day, I had never used an AMD-based machine before. Even my Apple computers ran on Intel chips in recent years. I heard about AMD Ryzen being a great new 8-core CPU, and it really delivers on all fronts.It's cut my batch raw image processing time down by 70%! Video render times are also cut in half.I'm using the AMD Ryzen 7 1800X along with the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 8 GB DDR5 professional GPU with apps like DxO Optics Pro 11 Elite,Adobe Photoshop Lightroom CC, Adobe Photoshop CC, Adobe Premiere CC, , Capture One Pro 10 and Vegas 14 Pro.I highly recommend if you're a photographer, videographer, designer or motion graphics artists looking to radically speed up your workflow!
Read more..

30.3.2018

Well I can definitely recommend this CPU if your workload is based on multi core application like VM s CAD or anything workstation related. It's also good for gaming , streaming and video editing of course, but keep in mind that some applications don't use all the cores and that will seem slower than the counter-part intel i7 witch this competes against.So if you re looking for something strictly for gaming go for the i7 or even i5 , those perform better at higher refresh rates <100hz , but if you don't play on high refresh rate monitor and you have some work to do that involves a lot of loading and you can take advantage of all the cores(in my case game dev) then I would recommend this,stable and powerful.10/10 , great purchase , everything is as it should be and with this discount is a no brainer.Keep in mind that the new Ryzen 2 refresh will come in this April so if you are patient , you might get better performance for the same money.
Read more..

2.10.2018

At 240$ this thing was a steal. Overclocked to 3.95ghz while keeping the voltage at 1.36v, supposedly can do better at 1.4v but I don't want to push it. Crushes any multitasking and Cinebench at 1725cb for my system. Make sure you get 2666mhz or higher RAM, I hear it doesn't play nice with lower frequency RAM. I use some cheapo overclocked 19 CAS sticks down to 16 CAS but even at 19 CAS they still get along just fine giving around 1700 cb. A good air cooler like the Cooler Master Hyper 212 is perfectly fine for it, I don't have experience with liquid cooling but it's probably only necessary if you really wanna push this thing.Early on 1st gen Ryzen chips had their quirks but they are pretty much evened out at this point with bios/chipset/driver updates.The 2700x seems to be a better processor but if you are looking to upgrade to AM4 and already have a cooler, this is a damn good CPU to hold you over until Zen2 or Zen2+.
Read more..

20.3.2017

Different from every other AMD processor I've had. SoC, with I/O & mem control incorporated, instead of in the chipset. I must have a good one `cause I've been able to bump up the DDR4 to 3200MHz without any troubles. Haven't messed with any oc yet though. With HWmonitor open watching the ryzen speed go higher when it's being used or see it low at 2200MHz idling I might just leave it alone for now.Runs cool, this and the DDR4 use less E also.I read the specs and comparisons, I can feel a difference between this stock 1800X >> 8350 FX @ 4.5GHz in my old rig. Moving large data is a lot quicker than piledriver was, with the small stuff it seems about the same.**Another bios out for my mb,bumped this up to 4.2GHZ so easily, tightened the mem timings, and yep you can feel the os running better. I know it will go higher. I put it back down to 39 `cause of the increasing noise from three 180s and two 140s.
Read more..

26.3.2017

Love my new Ryzen.Pros: 8 core 16 thread which has been a very nice upgrade. Great at multi core tasks. Single core Pro-Formance for games is not the best but still pulling greater then 60fps. Overclocking is easy and there are already some nice utilies for it.Cons: single core proformance is lacking, would not recommend this one if you are just gaming, go for the 1700 or an intel. No stock cooler. Early adopters problems, be ready to flash your board bios which ever one you purchase, and check often for more bios updates. Not a lot of head room for over clocking. Most are only getting 4.0, some can make 4.1.Over all I think it's a decent product and should bring a good competitor to intel.

12.4.2018

First of all, the people posting one star reviews on all the Ryzen products complaining about Intel and AMD "fanboys" are pathetically hilarious. Second, I picked this because it's Passmark to cost ratio was fantastic.I paired it with an AS Rock Taichi board for an Unraid server build. Initially I had stability issues, but that was mostly fixed by changing the c state settings in the BIOS.Performance has been stellar. I have run a couple instances of Plex transcoding and a virtual machine with GPU passthrough with plenty left on the table.Stability issues are annoying, but I'd definitely buy again over other available products for another server build.

25.9.2017

GREAT AT MULTITASKING! This beast can run Nier Automata, Black Desert, and DOOM on Max settings, while streaming, while watching a Youtube video, while eating a pizza with zero hitches. It is a monster! I can't wait to see what Zen2 will be like!I am currently running 3.9Ghz at 1.33v. AMD recommends that you stay under 1.35v and up to a maximum of 1.45v. I don't want to push it higher than what AMD recommends so I'm happy with this OC. Idle temperatures seem to vary between bios updates. The previous Bios I had temps at 25C but, bios update 1501 my idle temps are at 35c and operating/gaming 40-45C. Under stress test it doesn't go higher than 50C.

18.7.2017

Yes you could buy a 1700 and overclock it, though you don't know how fast that will run.I picked the 1800X on the theory its better quality silicon and prefer to stick near the official clock speed for reliability.The high thread count really comes into it's own for work. As a developer running lots of tasks locally, using docker etc, a higher thread count is ideal.I switched from Xeon to Ryzen and have noticed no difference in reliability and no issues with compatibility. The only thing around that's any better is Threadripper which is so much more money and is 2 of these stuck together and do you REALLY need THAT many threads?

List All Products

Terms and ConditionsPrivacy Policy